Here's the most interesting finding from the study: Although 60% of respondents say disconnected tools are a major challenge, only 7% say disconnected tools would trigger a change in their remote access approach.
Instead, manufacturers are more likely to act because of:
- Cybersecurity concerns (17%)
- Compliance requirements (10%)
- Cyber-insurance requirements (10%)
In other words, many organizations learn to live with inefficiency. They've built workarounds and devised manual processes. They've come to accept complexity as part of daily operations.
But risk is different. Risk attracts attention. Not only from leadership teams, but also from auditors, insurers, and regulators.
That finding aligns closely with what Felix Wirthmann, Director of Product Management at TeamViewer, sees in conversations with manufacturers. As he put it in a recent Q&A:
"Consolidation is a major driver, and regulation is another. NIS2 (the European Union's Network and Information Security Directive) is a real game changer because if you have a major incident and haven't followed the latest cybersecurity regulations, top management can be held personally liable."
"Cyber insurance," Felix says, "is also driving change. One recent customer was prompted in part by their cybersecurity insurer, which told them they had to improve their security posture."
Manufacturers have dealt with fragmented environments for years. What's changing is the level of scrutiny around security and governance. Regulations such as NIS2, along with growing audit obligations and stricter cyber-insurance requirements, are increasing expectations around access controls, risk management, and accountability.
As a result, manufacturers are finding it harder to justify disconnected systems, limited visibility, and inconsistent approaches to remote access. External pressures are becoming a stronger catalyst for modernization than operational inefficiencies alone.
The lesson here is simple. Operational pain creates awareness. But security and compliance are what really create urgency and drive action.
The growing pressure from security and compliance
When we looked deeper into security-related challenges, another pattern emerged. Manufacturers aren't struggling most with day-to-day vendor access. What they're struggling with is proving that access is secure, controlled, and auditable.
The highest-friction areas reported were:
- Audit and compliance requirements (33%)
- Accessing legacy systems (27%)
- Remote vendor access (17%)
This matters because many manufacturing environments weren't designed with today's security expectations in mind.
Teams often need to manage newer security requirements, like NIS2, alongside systems that have been running for decades.
This means that what starts as an operational issue can quickly become a governance issue. Because the more fragmented an environment becomes, the harder it is to maintain consistency, visibility, and control.
Felix put it like this: "If you have 10 different systems, you have to patch 10 different systems, configure 10 different systems, and stay expert in all of them. That increases the risk of mistakes and backdoors."
Visibility matters more than ever